Why RAID 5 Stops Working In 2009

Lally Singh recommends a ZDNet piece predicting the imminent demise of RAID 5, noting that increasing storage and non-decreasing probability of disk failure will collide in a year or so. This reader adds, "Apparently, RAID 6 isn't far behind. I'll keep the ZFS plug short. Go ZFS. There, that was it." "Disk drive capacities double every 18-24 months. We have 1 TB drives now, and in 2009 we'll have 2 TB drives. With a 7-drive RAID 5 disk failure, you'll have 6 remaining 2 TB drives. As the RAID controller is busily reading through those 6 disks to reconstruct the data from the failed drive, it is almost certain it will see an [unrecoverable read error]. So the read fails ... The message 'we can't read this RAID volume' travels up the chain of command until an error message is presented on the screen. 12 TB of your carefully protected — you thought! — data is gone. Oh, you didn't back it up to tape? Bummer!"

2126252

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

i

sKt2S1OLvFQ

Kommentare

1

... aber der Ansatz passt. Wenn man Raid5 über längere Jahre betreibt, fällt irgendwann eine HDD aus, und beim wiederherstellen von 2 anderen Festplatten könnte ein einzelner Lesefehler auftreten => großes Problem :-o Also doch besser Raid1 mit schnellen HDD's, soweit möglich - da sollte in so einem Fall die Wiederherstellung um einiges leichter sein ;-)

Neuen Kommentar schreiben